Skip to main content

Counsel denies Afridi intimidated election staff

A hearing at the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Monday saw heated exchanges as lawyers representing Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Sohail Afridi challenged the commission’s jurisdiction in a case alleging intimidation of election staff during the Haripur by-election. The ECP had initiated proceedings after Sohail Afridi was accused of making threatening remarks during a public rally in Abbottabad, where he allegedly warned officials of consequences if election-day misconduct occurred. The Commission said such statements put at risk the “safety of polling staff, police and voters” and potentially violated the code of conduct prohibiting public officeholders from influencing elections. The proceedings opened with complaints from lawyer Ali Bukhari and the Advocate General KP, who said lawyers were mistreated at the ECP. Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Sikandar Sultan Raja apologised, assuring action against the officers responsible. Read: ECP takes notice of K-P CM's remarks He said the stoppages at the gate were due to security requirements. In an informal exchange, the CEC told lawyer Naeem Panjhutha that he had even received a vote from the CEC’s own household, to which Panjhutha replied he was aware. Special Secretary ECP maintained that Article 218(3) clearly outlines the commission’s powers and said action against the KP chief minister would proceed in line with the law. The Peshawar High Court has previously held that while Article 218(3) gives the ECP broad authority to ensure fair elections, its actions must still be grounded in statutory powers. This precedent has been cited in recent challenges involving the ECP’s jurisdiction. "Lawyers were being stopped and humiliated at the entrance and added that he himself had also been stopped", said Ali Bukhari. He reiterated that the ECP lacked the jurisdiction to hear the matter, saying a notice had already been issued by the District Monitoring Officer (DMO) in the constituency. He questioned whether the case could run before two forums simultaneously, pointing out that he had been summoned by the DMO prior to being summoned by the ECP and had again been called to submit a reply on the 27th. Read more: K-P CM challenges ECP code of conduct notice in PHC Afridi has already moved the Peshawar High Court, calling the ECP notice “malicious” and arguing that it was issued without a mandatory report from the District Monitoring Officer, a core part of his challenge that mirrors Bukhari’s argument in the hearing. Bukhari insisted that the petition filed by Babar Nawaz should be heard together with his own and warned that summoning their side over a political rally in Abbottabad would “open a new Pandora’s box.” He also questioned whether the ECP would summon the prime minister and the Punjab chief minister for similar actions, noting that Punjab’s chief minister had announced development projects worth Rs2.5 billion in Hassan Abdal. He argued that violations of the code of conduct had taken place elsewhere without any summons being issued. The controversy has already triggered political backlash, with PML-N leaders accusing Afridi of issuing threats to election officials. Punjab Information Minister Uzma Bukhari publicly criticised him, calling him “a habitual liar” and referring to his alleged warning that officers “would not see tomorrow’s sun.” Chairman Election Commission responded by saying that action would be taken “without discrimination” and clarified that if the prime minister had made such a speech before the election, he too would have been issued a notice. Ministers and candidates in other constituencies had in fact been summoned over code-of-conduct violations, he added. Babar Nawaz’s counsel, Sajeel Swati, argued that the KP chief minister had clearly threatened election staff and emphasised that the ECP’s authority did not cease merely because a monitoring officer had imposed a fine. Bukhari pressed the commission to first decide on the maintainability of the case. The ECP directed the KP chief minister’s lawyer to submit a written reply at the next hearing and said an appropriate order on maintainability would be issued. The commission granted Sohail Afridi exemption from appearing at the next hearing and adjourned proceedings until December 4. Later, Afridi’s lawyer formally challenged the ECP’s jurisdiction, raising objections to the maintainability of the petitions. The commission reserved its decision on Afridi’s application. Salman Akram Raja said Sohail Afridi had appeared before the ECP and complied with the law. A White Paper on the Haripur elections would be issued soon and added that they would continue to examine the “spirit of the law”, he added. Also read: PML-N's Azma rebuffs K-P CM's claims "Bukhari had placed objections before the commission and maintained that all parties should be treated equally." He added that the KP chief minister had not threatened anyone, saying it was within the chief minister’s right to admonish officers. He said a detailed reply would be submitted to the ECP. The legal team said a similar petition was already pending before the ECP in KP and argued that identical cases could not proceed in two separate places. They maintained that there had been no interference in the election process and that the chief minister would not need to appear again. Bukhari said they had based their arguments on two points, including that the matter had been taken up under Article 218, and added that they would appear before the returning officer in Haripur since the case was already being heard there. He also said they had submitted details regarding the Punjab chief minister’s husband in support of their position. The case stems from complaints filed by Babar Nawaz, the by-election candidate, who accused Afridi of using his position to intimidate the administration. His petition argues that the ECP must act against any public officeholder attempting to influence an electoral contest, an argument reinforced by the Commission’s earlier directive to its provincial chapter and the KP police chief to review Afridi’s remarks.

from Pakistan News, Latest News Pakistan, Pakistan Headline | The Express Tribune https://ift.tt/zjLFs8m

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt, PTI kick off second round of talks ahead of Oct 4 long march

The second round of talks between the government and the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf began on Saturday, with National Assembly (NA) Speaker Ayaz Sadiq chairing the session, according to a statement issued by the National Assembly (NA) on X. A day earlier, the first round of talks between the government and opposition concluded with the two sides deciding to meet again on Saturday (today) in the NA speaker’s chamber. The negotiations come amid continued tensions after PTI’s announcement of a long march towards Islamabad on September 27 that was rescheduled to October 4. Currently, the standoff between the federal and provincial governments remains unresolved. The speaker said the previous day’s session was held in a “very cordial atmosphere” and expressed hope that all sides would continue the dialogue in the same spirit. Sadiq also thanked members of the government, PPP and opposition for participating in the talks. حکومت، پ...

PTI dismisses PM Shehbaz's 'mere offer' for talks, says govt can initiate contact with opposition leadership

The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Tuesday dismissed Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's proposal for renewed talks as a "mere offer”, while saying that the government could contact leaders of the opposition in the National Assembly and Senate for negotiations if it were sincere. The statement came amid heightened political tensions in the country as the PTI's long march reached Kohat. Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Sohail Afridi is leading the convoy, which began its march towards Islamabad on Sunday to demand the release of party founder Imran Khan and press the government over what PTI describes as broader political and constitutional grievances. The convoy is currently in Kohat after travelling through Lakki Marwat and Karak, and is expected to depart for Peshawar later today as the party continues its phased mobilisation towards the federal capital. PM Shehbaz earlier today renewed an offer of talks to the PTI, saying the government was prepared to ...

Pakistan rejects India's 'internal matter' claim on Kashmir at UN

Pakistan on Saturday rejected India's characterisation of Jammu and Kashmir as an internal matter, telling a United Nations General Assembly committee that the territory's final status remains unresolved and must be determined in accordance with the wishes of the Kashmiri people. Speaking during the general debate of the Third Committee of the 81st session of the UN General Assembly, Pakistan's First Secretary Sarfraz Ahmed Gohar said Islamabad rejected New Delhi's assertion that Jammu and Kashmir was an integral part of India. "Pakistan categorically rejects India's futile attempts to dismiss the Jammu and Kashmir dispute as a so-called internal matter," Gohar said, according to remarks shared by Pakistan's Permanent Mission to the UN. Pakistan categorically rejects India's futile attempts to dismiss the Jammu and Kashmir dispute as a so-called internal matter. Jammu and Kashmir is an internationally recognized disputed territory, and it...